🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, covering domestic abuse, following extensive and heated debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish laws and support services to end all types of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its focus on equal rights undermines traditional families and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the convention, a move sponsored by political opponents but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Responses

One of the primary political groups supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's human rights commissioner Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group Equality Now stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 individuals have signed a national petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has announced a protest for next Thursday, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body commented that Latvia had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention in 2021, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of belief-based viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the supreme judicial body.

"This vote represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," stated a human rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been increasing in multiple European countries
• The European treaty mandates specific safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable discussions in additional member states